My classwork for BIMM143
Joseph Lo (PID: A18121493)
Today we will begin our exploration of important machine learning methods with a focus on clustering and dimensionallity reduction.
To start testing these methods let’s make up some sample data to cluster where we know what the answer should be.
hist( rnorm(3000, mean=10))

Q. Can you generate 30 numbers centered at +3 and 30 numbers at -3 taken at random from a normal distribution.
tmp <- c(rnorm(30, mean=3), rnorm(30, mean=-3))
x <- cbind(x=tmp, y=rev(tmp))
plot(x)

The main function in “base R” for K-means clustering is called
kmeans(), let’s try it out:
k <- kmeans(x, centers = 2)
k
K-means clustering with 2 clusters of sizes 30, 30
Cluster means:
x y
1 3.443737 -2.969099
2 -2.969099 3.443737
Clustering vector:
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
[39] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Within cluster sum of squares by cluster:
[1] 76.76495 76.76495
(between_SS / total_SS = 88.9 %)
Available components:
[1] "cluster" "centers" "totss" "withinss" "tot.withinss"
[6] "betweenss" "size" "iter" "ifault"
Q. What component of your kmeans result object has the cluster centers?
k$centers
x y
1 3.443737 -2.969099
2 -2.969099 3.443737
Q. What component of your kmeans result object has the cluster size (i.e. how many points are in each cluster)?
k$size
[1] 30 30
Q. What component of your kmeans result object has the cluster membership vector (i.e. the main clustering result: which points are in which cluster)?
k$cluster
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
[39] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Q. Plot the results of clustering (i.e. our data colored by the clustering result) along with the cluster centers.
plot(x, col=k$cluster)
points(k$centers, col="blue", pch=15, cex=2)

Q. Can you run
kmeans()again and clusterxinto 4 clusters and plot the results just like we did above with coloring by cluster and the cluster centers shown in blue.
k4 <- kmeans(x, centers=4)
plot(x, col=k4$cluster)
points(k4$centers, col="blue", pch=15, cex=2)

Key-point: Kmeans will always return the clustering that we ask for (this is the “K” or “centers” in K-means)!
k$tot.withinss
[1] 153.5299
The main function for Hierarchical clustering in base R is called
hclust().
One of the main differences with respect to the kmeans() function is
that you can not just pass your input data directly to hclust() - it
needs a “distance matrix” as input. We can get this from lot’s of places
including the dist() function.
d <- dist(x)
hc <- hclust(d)
plot(hc)

We can “cut” the dendrogram or “tree” at a given height to yield our
“clusters”. For this we use the function cutree()
plot(hc)
abline(h=10, col="red")

grps <- cutree(hc, h=10)
grps
[1] 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
[39] 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Q. Plot our data
xcolored by the clustering result fromhclust()andcutree()?
plot(x, col=grps)

plot(hc)
abline(h=4, col="red")

cutree(hc, h=4)
[1] 1 2 2 2 3 1 1 2 3 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 1 3 3 2 3 1 3 2 2 1 4 5 5 6 4 6 5 6
[39] 6 4 4 4 5 4 4 6 4 5 4 4 4 6 5 4 4 6 5 5 5 4
PCA is a popular dimensionality reduction technique that is widely used in bioinformatics.
Read data on food consumption in the UK
url <- "https://tinyurl.com/UK-foods"
x <- read.csv(url)
x
X England Wales Scotland N.Ireland
1 Cheese 105 103 103 66
2 Carcass_meat 245 227 242 267
3 Other_meat 685 803 750 586
4 Fish 147 160 122 93
5 Fats_and_oils 193 235 184 209
6 Sugars 156 175 147 139
7 Fresh_potatoes 720 874 566 1033
8 Fresh_Veg 253 265 171 143
9 Other_Veg 488 570 418 355
10 Processed_potatoes 198 203 220 187
11 Processed_Veg 360 365 337 334
12 Fresh_fruit 1102 1137 957 674
13 Cereals 1472 1582 1462 1494
14 Beverages 57 73 53 47
15 Soft_drinks 1374 1256 1572 1506
16 Alcoholic_drinks 375 475 458 135
17 Confectionery 54 64 62 41
It looks like the row names are not set properly. We can fix this
rownames(x) <- x[,1]
x <- x[,-1]
A better way to do this is fix the row names assignment at import time:
x <- read.csv(url, row.names = 1)
Q1. How many rows and columns are in your new data frame named x? What R functions could you use to answer this questions?
dim(x)
[1] 17 4
17 rows and 4 columns, use dim().
Q2. Which approach to solving the ‘row-names problem’ mentioned above do you prefer and why? Is one approach more robust than another under certain circumstances?
I like rownames() more because it is easier to memorize in my opinion.
However, the second approach is probably more robust cause if you run
the first approach too many times it deletes each column, making it an
error at the end.
barplot(as.matrix(x), beside=T, col=rainbow(nrow(x)))

Q3: Changing what optional argument in the above barplot() function results in the following plot?
barplot(as.matrix(x), beside=F, col=rainbow(nrow(x)))

Set beside to False.
Q4. Is missing
Q5: We can use the
pairs()function to generate all pairwise plots for our countries. Can you make sense of the following code and resulting figure? What does it mean if a given point lies on the diagonal for a given plot?
pairs(x, col=rainbow(nrow(x)), pch=16)

If the point lies on the diagonal that means they are the same values, if they are off the diaganol that means they are different foods. If its above the diagonal that means its on the England axis while below the diagonal its on the Ireland axis.
We can install the pheatmap package with the install.packages()
command that we used previously.Remember that we always run this in the
console and not a code chunk in our quarto document.
library(pheatmap)
pheatmap( as.matrix(x) )

Of all these plot really only the pairs() plot was useful. This
however took a bit of work to interpret and will not scale when I am
looking at much bigger datasets.
The main function in “base R” for PCA is called prcomp().
pca <- prcomp(t(x))
summary(pca)
Importance of components:
PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4
Standard deviation 324.1502 212.7478 73.87622 3.176e-14
Proportion of Variance 0.6744 0.2905 0.03503 0.000e+00
Cumulative Proportion 0.6744 0.9650 1.00000 1.000e+00
Q. How much varance is captured in the first PC?
67.4%
Q. How many PCs do I need to capture at least 90% of the total varance in the dataset?
Two PCs capture 96.5% of the total varance.
Q. Plot our main PCA result. Folks can call this different things depending on their field of study e.g. “PC plot”, “ordienation plot”, “Score plot”, “PC1 vs PC2 plot”…
attributes(pca)
$names
[1] "sdev" "rotation" "center" "scale" "x"
$class
[1] "prcomp"
To generate our PCA score plot we want the pca$x component of the
result object
pca$x
PC1 PC2 PC3 PC4
England -144.99315 -2.532999 105.768945 -4.894696e-14
Wales -240.52915 -224.646925 -56.475555 5.700024e-13
Scotland -91.86934 286.081786 -44.415495 -7.460785e-13
N.Ireland 477.39164 -58.901862 -4.877895 2.321303e-13
my_cols <- c("orange", "red", "blue", "darkgreen")
plot(pca$x[,1], pca$x[,2], col=my_cols, pch=16)

library(ggplot2)
ggplot(pca$x) +
aes(PC1, PC2) +
geom_point(col=my_cols)

How do the original vaiable (i.e. the 17 different foods) contribute to our new PCs?
ggplot(pca$rotation) +
aes(x = PC1,
y = reorder(rownames(pca$rotation), PC1)) +
geom_col(fill = "steelblue") +
xlab("PC1 Loading Score") +
ylab("") +
theme_bw() +
theme(axis.text.y = element_text(size = 9))
